From the January 2010 Idaho Observer:
In Russia Today, the article, “911 reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job,” first published September 9, 2009 was just published a second time on January 6, 2010. Highlights from the article:
“9/11 was the day steel-framed buildings fell like sandcastles, the laws of physics worked in reverse, and the United States Air Force went Missing In Action. So what is the real story?”
“In fact, the only things that really added up on 9/11, for those who were keeping score, were the incredible number of inconsistencies.”
“...But this is undoubtedly the greatest irony of them all: Osama bin Laden, the alleged mastermind of 9/11, does not even appear on the FBI’s most wanted list. Why? Officials at the Bureau admit that there is simply not enough evidence to arrest him! So if the FBI is not satisfied with the U.S. government’s explanation for the events that transpired on 9/11, why should the public be satisfied?”
The four part article can be viewed online at http://rt.com/Top_News/2009-09-09/911-attack-job.html
The February 2010 edition of FOCUS Money, a weekly German business magazine, is presenting most of the crucial arguments and contradictions on five glossy pages. Among other considerations, the article suggests that the collapse of the World Trade Center could have been a controlled demolition.
The first page of the article shows pictures of 9/11 skeptics: Charlie Sheen, Sharon Stone, Rosie O’Donnell, William Rodriguez (next to GW Bush), former Governor Jesse Ventura, Richard Gage, Federal Judge Dieter Deiseroth and many others. The rest of the article is packed with information such as evidence of a controlled demolition, criticism of the fire theory, the questions on the interceptors, and WTC 7 and the Pentagon. There is talk of the “impossible flight maneuvers,” the resignation of Senator Max Cleland who is quoted as saying, “It’s a fraud, a national scandal” and of the myriad of lies to the Commission, hindering the investigation. The mysterious death of Barry Jenning, a former Deputy Director of Emergency Services Department of the City of New York, is also mentioned. He had saved many people from WTC 7, and covered in dust gave a live interview on ABC, and then much later for “Loose Change” maker Dylan Avery.
FOCUS Money is currently the second most popular business publication in Germany with a weekly circulation of 145,788 copies sold.
In September 2009, the German TV magazine (TV Hören und sehen) published an extensive article on 9/11 that highlighted the following questions with graphic pictures validating the concerns of 9/11 researchers worldwide:
The January 22, 2010 edition of Japan’s magazine, Weekly Asahi printed Architect Richard Gage’s take on the WTC towers collapse.And its cover, Weekly Asahi, January 22, 2010 edition.
Their cover above reads: 9/11 Mystery – the cause of the collapse of the buildings “was not a plane crash.”
The title of the article is “9/11 Terror in NY - American architects group demands reinvestigation - WTC buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.” This 4-page article explains what Gage has been lecturing about, in the first two and a half pages. The last third of the article is devoted to proponents of the “official story”: the Architectural Institute of Japan as well as Associate Prof. Isobe of Tsukuba University who from his own research concluded that the “spring back phenomenon”-weak junction areas (compared with Japanese buildings), and the plane crash shock caused the collapse.
Therefore, many readers might think, “Oh, so Japanese experts are not agreeing with this group of architects.”
Yet, Isobe himself says something positive in our view. From its fourth page, Mr. Isobe points out that the official investigation in the U.S. doesn’t explain the mechanism of the collapse. “Debris and pieces (of the buildings) were taken away from the site immediately and the vital evidence to figure out the cause was gone. That is provoking a lot of questions,” he says.
The article includes Mr. Fujita’s essay, “The official story is not convincing,” which supports Gage’s credibility, and it ends with Gage’s reply to the question, WHO could have done it:
“We don’t have theories. All we have is evidence. We present the evidence we have found in front of the victims’ families who have lost their precious, loved ones. And that will reveal who was responsible for this crime.”
According to data prepared by the Japan Magazine Publishers Association, Weekly Asahi prints 267,914 copies weekly.